Thirty-two years ago, when I hung out my shingle as a furniture maker, it was hard to find an excellent dovetail saw. Today, we have it good—maybe too good. There is a bounty of great saws on the market, saws that are well-tuned and ready to cut fine dovetails right out of the box. But that can make picking the right one daunting. For such an essential tool, a test seemed in order. To narrow the field, I focused on Western-style backsaws (to learn more about Japanese saws, see Andrew Hunter’s “The Power of the Pull Stroke,” FWW #249).
It’s amazing how differently one dovetail saw can perform from another. It’s a simple tool—a blade with rip teeth, a back, and a handle—yet the details can really set a saw apart. Even so, individual elements such as plate thickness, set (and the resultant kerf), hang, pitch, rake, weight, and length are far from acting individually. Instead, what matters most is the sum of the parts in practice—in other words, how well the saw cuts.
With a little help from his friends: For a broader perspective on the saws, seven fellow woodworkers came by Gochnour’s shop to test the lot. Their opinions pretty much agreed with his.
Because these tools are so personal, I invited seven skilled woodworkers, all proficient in dovetail joinery, to my shop for a few hours on a Saturday morning to test the dovetail saws. We made multiple cuts in 1⁄2-in.-thick cherry and oak with every saw and took copious notes along the way, noting elements like ease of start, tracking, ergonomics, and speed. In the end, of the 13 dovetail saws we tested, the seven listed here led the pack. Any one of these saws could be a great choice. The seven saws that made the final cut include the Bad Axe Stiletto, Gramercy, Lie-Nielsen, Pax 1776, Skelton, Veritas Standard, and Winsor dovetail saws.
Also included is a glossary of standard dovetail saw terms. While there isn’t an algorithm for the perfect saw, an understanding of the basic terminology used for the parts and their significance may help you define which saw is right for you.
This saw cut with ease, accuracy, and speed. Its tooth pattern is fairly complex: a 10° rake for the first 2 in. and 8° for the rest, with bevels of 10° on the first 2 in. and 5° on the rest. Bad Axe will size the handle and suit the appearance to your preferences. This saw is my top choice, with the highest marks from most reviewers. One called its performance in both cherry and oak “amazing overall.” Another said, “This saw cuts like you imagine a dovetail saw should cut.”This saw is the lightest and shortest of the group. It also has the highest hang, and its tote feels the most petite. It started well and, once going, cut smoothly most of the time. Although the saw was a bit catchy for some in white oak, one person noted it “cut really well” in the wood. People with larger hands tended to be put off by the small handle, but others thought the shape was great.This saw performed beautifully on multiple tasks, such as starting a cut, traveling smoothly, and tracking a line. It’s well balanced, although the handle was a little tight for larger hands. Many of the other testers agreed the tool is great all around, but a few had issues with tracking. Still, one noted, “Very easy to start and use in general.” Most reviewers said this saw offers the best value.One of the most noticeable features of the Pax is its heft, which is, in part, due to the saw’s sizable brass back. The saw starts with ease and cuts steadily and fast, and the sawing itself feels rigid. The tool also comes in 8-in. and 12-in. lengths. Aside from the wide kerf, I found the Pax to be excellent. Most reviewers felt the saw started well. Some, though, said cutting oak was a bit of a challenge.It’s difficult to say anything negative about the Skelton dovetail saw. It excelled at every task in both oak and cherry, from beginning the kerf to tracking a line quickly. It took me a little while to adjust to the higher hang, but that’s because I’m used to saws with low hangs. The company also offers custom sizes for its handle. Others loved the saw, too. One person remarked, “This saw makes the user look like a pro.”
Of the group, this saw provides the most bang for the buck. It cut extremely smoothly and was quite maneuverable. While the other saws on the list use metal spines, the spine of the Veritas is a composite that conserves weight. Reviewers noted the saw’s ease of use and speed of cut, and some said it performed as well as pricier saws. Some with larger hands commented on the tight fit between the top and bottom horns of the handle.
This saw deserves high praise. It cut fast and easily tracked a line. Its only downside was a tendency to be a bit grabby in the white oak. Of the saws reviewed, it had the most comfortable handle for my large hands. Another reviewer with large hands noted the Winsor’s handle was his favorite. Another chose this saw as the top pick. Winsor also makes 8-in. and 9-in. versions.
From Fine Woodworking #264
To view the entire article, please click the View PDF button below:
Fine Woodworking Recommended Products
Lie-Nielsen No. 102 Low Angle Block Plane
With smooth, precise adjustments and wonderful balance, this compact block plane is a joy to use. It doesn’t have any bells and whistles, but there’s not a better block plane available for the money.
These gauges can be easily and precisely adjusted with one hand, which allows you to set the tool while holding a ruler or workpiece in the other. The quality is exceptional, and all have sharp cutters that offer great visibility.
Rob Cosman's dovetail saw is the BEST one I've found. I believe it should not only have been in the "cream of the crop" group but also one of the--if not THE--best dovetail saw. Why was it not included?
Where can one purchase the Winsor saw depicted in the article? Can't find it on any of my usual sources. And, Google can't even find it. How do they stay in business?
Totally thought Cosman's saw should have been represented (as other commenters did I see). If you're going to test 13 saws, then comments on all of them should have been relevant - otherwise, its seems selective and could be misinterpreted.
Don't mean to harp, but as an update to the article in issue #183, also by CG, it is curious the results from that article were not referenced. 2 saws in both articles - LN and Pax 1776.
It seems curious to me that the Cosman saw was chosen by this same publication as the best saw. Now less than two years later, not even a top 7? Has the rest of the saws improved that much, or Cosman's became worse? Neither case seems likely.
This piece was below Finewoodworking’s usual standards. Maybe it is me, but I seem to have seen a slow decline in the quality of the magazine. I have been a subscriber for over 25 years.
Become an UNLIMITED member and get it all: searchable online archive of every issue, how-to videos, Complete Illustrated Guide to Woodworking digital series, print magazine, e-newsletter, and more.
From Fine Woodworking #264
Comments
Where's the Rob Cosman dovetail saw?
Rob Cosman's dovetail saw is the BEST one I've found. I believe it should not only have been in the "cream of the crop" group but also one of the--if not THE--best dovetail saw. Why was it not included?
Where can one purchase the Winsor saw depicted in the article? Can't find it on any of my usual sources. And, Google can't even find it. How do they stay in business?
http://winsorsaw.com/
Totally thought Cosman's saw should have been represented (as other commenters did I see). If you're going to test 13 saws, then comments on all of them should have been relevant - otherwise, its seems selective and could be misinterpreted.
Show us all the saws you tested!
Don't mean to harp, but as an update to the article in issue #183, also by CG, it is curious the results from that article were not referenced. 2 saws in both articles - LN and Pax 1776.
It seems curious to me that the Cosman saw was chosen by this same publication as the best saw. Now less than two years later, not even a top 7? Has the rest of the saws improved that much, or Cosman's became worse? Neither case seems likely.
This piece was below Finewoodworking’s usual standards. Maybe it is me, but I seem to have seen a slow decline in the quality of the magazine. I have been a subscriber for over 25 years.
Really a poor comparison of just a few saws. Fine woodworking isn't up to its past standards. Not renewing this membership.
Log in or create an account to post a comment.
Sign up Log in