found a bailey #7 22″ lon hand plane at a antique store
I was wondering if it is of any real value as i paid 22 dollars for it
also on cleaning it up i noticed some of the parts are stanley ( what gives)
found a bailey #7 22″ lon hand plane at a antique store
I was wondering if it is of any real value as i paid 22 dollars for it
also on cleaning it up i noticed some of the parts are stanley ( what gives)
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialGet instant access to over 100 digital plans available only to UNLIMITED members. Start your 14-day FREE trial - and get building!
Become an UNLIMITED member and get it all: searchable online archive of every issue, how-to videos, Complete Illustrated Guide to Woodworking digital series, print magazine, e-newsletter, and more.
Get complete site access to video workshops, digital plans library, online archive, and more, plus the print magazine.
Already a member? Log in
Replies
Bailey pattern was and probably still is the style of plane that Stanley made it should clean up fairly well depending on it age you can probably still get parts.
regards from oz
You can make it fool proof but not idiot proof
Edited 6/1/2006 4:28 am ET by Bolts
If I remember correctly, Leonard Bailey stated making metal planes shortly after the cvil war (~1867). His designs were innovative and legendary- he did for the US what Norris was doing in the UK. The Bailey line was acquired in the late 19th century by Stanley Lever and Rule, and Bailey's name appeared on their product for years afterward. There was a falling out between Stanley and Bailey, and he left to make planes under another name (Union?).
The Bailey #7 jointer is a fine plane- and the US standard jointer. Stanley also made a more upscale jointer, the Bedrock 607, with a more sophistocated frog design, but they sold many more Bailey #7s than Bedrocks.
$22 sounds like a good deal for the plane, but it would depend on the condition. If the throat and body are undamaged, than it should clean up nicely. I have a Bailey #5 jack (ca 1890) that I fettled, and it is my main hand plane.
Glaucon
If you don't think too good, then don't think too much...
I believe stanley identified the #7 as a try plane, reserving the term jointer for the #8. As bogus as Stanley's names are/were, this is a pretty decent distinction. So the #7 should get the curved blade and frog set back a bit and the wider #8 the square blade and frog set forward a bit. A try plane would probably benefit from the superior bedrock frog, the #8 not so much (#5 not at all).Adam
Dude!
On the purely economic end of things, if it is complete, and not damaged, then you got a pretty good deal. Most #7s on the infamous auction site go for around $50 to $125, depending on type, condition, etc.
On most early 20th Century Stanley planes, the word "Bailey" was cast on the toe of the plane; depending on the date of manufacture, you may or may not find "Stanley" elsewhere on the plane (usually on the lever cap). All made by the same guys (Stanley). (This is a generalization; I don't have any references handy at the moment, so I can't give the exact date range...)
19th century Stanley and Bailey planes are a different story.......
Cheers!
James
Show us a picture, but at that price providing there is no structural damage (cracks, welds etc) it is a gift. Well it would be to me at least, because having got it for a song I would be happy to give it a complete make-over to make it better than new.The #7 size is very versatile for furniture making .
Thanks to everyone for the input , i thought i had bought some kind of abortion when i saw the different company names on parts however i guess i was wrong
As for the condition other than being dirty as hell there are no cracks or welds and i checked the body for straightness and it seems dead on
All it seems to need besides more cleaning is to remove the teeth from the blade so all & all i feel ok on my purchase thanks to one and all on your observations
What do you mean "remove the teeth from the blade"?Look for a site at http://www.supertool.com for info on your plane. You'll be able to see descriptions and aging info on just about every plane Stanley made.
"I cut this piece four times and it's still too short."
The teeth i was refering to are the result of someone cutting nails and was said as a joke
<<All it seems to need besides more cleaning is to remove the teeth from the blade >>
If these are regularly spaced (about 20 or 25 or so to the inch) and look like they were machine-made, then you might reconsider removing them: what you probably have is a toothing blade. If it's original, it may have some monetary/collector value, and will certainly have some historical value.
A Hock or LN replacement iron for a #7 is only about $40±, and will provide exceptional service for a very long time.
<<... i thought i had bought some kind of abortion when i saw the different company names on parts however i guess i was wrong...>>
Also, as a side note, if you wanted a user plane, and, after you tune it up, it works to your satisfaction, then having mixed parts on it (if it actually does) is relatively unimportant, for practical purposes. For other reasons, including -- but not limited to -- collectibility, then you may well want all of the proper, type-specific parts. That, of course, is a determination that only you can make.
Cheers!
James
Dude, it looks like you did really good. I dropped $86 for mine +s&h+a hock iron. As a point of reference it says only BAILEY on the toe and only No 7 a the rear. There are three patent dates ending in 02, 02 and 10 in front of the tote and under the adjuster. It is in fact a 7c, clean as a whistle with a short squaty knob, a beautiful sweeping shape on the cheeks, no rust, a perfectly crisp mouth and no name on the very clean cap.
The only faults are the chipped top horn on the tote and while the japanning is 80% from the tote forward it is 40% in the rear. The super tool site that was mentioned will let you pinpoint the specific type. Congrats on a great find, Pat
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled