I have a plan for a small desser that I would like to downsize to about 50% of original size. Seems simple right? My question is, would you also down size the thickness of the materials used by the same 50%. It seems logical that you would; but is there a limit where the dimensions are getting to small? A 3/4 inch top would become a 3/8 inch thick top?
What about hardware for an undersized project like this? Federal style I believe.
Thanks,
Replies
Is this a display piece or model, or is it something that is intended for use?
If you plan to use it--an example would be bachelor chests--then you have to redesign it to use practical size lumber. A chest with 7/8" sides won't have the meet to be very strong with 7/16" sides, and in your example, a 3/8" top would make the piece look like a toy, or model, I'd think. The small pieces I've seen typically use somewhat thinner lumber but thickness isn't reduced anything like by 50%.
Thanks Steve
That is what I was suspecting. Making the thickness dimension reduce at the same rate will actual make the piece go out of proportion. The piece will be for use but it will be small in size. Just over 12"x12" Height & width. It will be a four draw dresser to be given away as a gift. Still working it out in my mind, Haven't even decided on a type of wood yet.
Thanks,
Allen , Scaling down the dimensions will be effective , but use adequate materials for the hardware used . Like drawers and slides or doors and hinges , imo , don't deviate too far from average on those specs .
I think scaling down the detail and pulls and knobs when you can will also help keep the look .
good luck dusty
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled