In this past years FWW magazines have been some articles on building a chest of drawers and am in the middle of one such project. In reference to the drawer runners and stretchers, which includes the drawer sides, backs and bottoms it is always mentioned using a secondary wood. Is this for aethetics, structural, or dollar savings? With the cost of wood now-a-days the difference between some the secondary woods mentioned for use and the primary that I’m using (cherry) is only slight. The only wood that I found pleasing was birch, but seemed to be a heavier wood than my second choice of alder. If I do go with a secondary wood, are there ones that I should stay away from? Thanks alot for opinions….gva…
Discussion Forum
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialCategories
Discussion Forum
Digital Plans Library
Member exclusive! – Plans for everyone – from beginners to experts – right at your fingertips.
Highlights
-
Shape Your Skills
when you sign up for our emails
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. -
Shop Talk Live Podcast
-
Our favorite articles and videos
-
E-Learning Courses from Fine Woodworking
-
-
Replies
Greg, secondary woods are considered to be so mostly for aesthetic reasons and cost, with structural considerations usually coming in third.
Let's say your primary wood, i.e., the show wood, is mostly Bombay rosewood, a Dalbergia. It's very expensive, not easily found in large chunks that can be used in the solid, and it's usually a bit of a pig to work to boot.
Mostly this species is sold as veneer because of its perceived beauty, which is true, its rarity, and the tricks you can achieve with veneer forms as opposed to working wood chunks in the solid, although it's a beautiful wood in this form too.
In this extreme circumstance then almost anything used with this rosewood species might be considered secondary wood.
Secondary woods are mostly used for hidden framing and other structural parts such as drawer sides and backs. It makes usually no real difference towards structural integrity for the most part what wood is used as hidden structural part, but it is quite rare for anyone to use Bombay rosewood as a a drawer slip, or cabinet framing part.
This is no doubt an extreme example, but even using poplar as a secondary wood with cherry as the main wood can make economic sense if there's enough material involved in a job. Slainte.
Richard Jones Furniture
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled