Replies

1. 
   wdwerker | Jan 10, 2012 03:11am | #1

   Shelves

   I have done it both ways. I personally think it looks better behind the face frame. The step back gives a layer of shadow lines that adds interest to the bookcase. It is also easier to fit the shelves with a little play and still appear nice with out sloppy gaps.

1. 
   klwsur1957 | Jan 11, 2012 11:26am | #2

   Shelves

   Thanks for your reply.  I was leaning that way also especially since I was fixing the middle shelve for stability and making the other two moveable. 

1. 
   wdwerker | Jan 13, 2012 10:18am | #5

   fixed middle shelf...

   I make my middle shelf the same width as the top and bottom of the bookcase, then put kreg pocket holes on the underside of it away from the line bore peg holes.  Finish the case, finish the shelves, and when loading the bookcase screw the shelf some where near the mid point. I find that 1/3 the way up works fine.  Now you do not have to work around a fixed shelf when you are setting your shelf heights, and it can be changed in the future.

2. 
   RalphBarker | Jan 11, 2012 12:17pm | #3

   To flush, or not to flush

   Or, should that be "flushify"?  ;-)

   I, too, prefer the look of shelves being behind the face frame. But, either design can be equally noble (just to continue the Shakespearean reference).

   Depending on the shelf material being used, also remember to design for any seasonal expansion/contraction.

3. 
   PSeverin | Jan 12, 2012 06:03pm | #4

   Not a fan of face frames.

   I prefer bookcases where the face frame is flush with the sides.    That way the shelves can slide in and out from the front and don't have to be tipped behind the face frame.  Which means that either the face frame is very narrow or the sides are thick.  I know it is not traditional, but what the heck, it's functional.

   Peter