hey gang,
has anyone used a stanley 278 rabbet plane? how does it perform in cross grain work in hardwoods like oak and maple? I ask because the nickers seem small, like on Stanleys other planes, i.e. #45 and 78 ect. thx!
hey gang,
has anyone used a stanley 278 rabbet plane? how does it perform in cross grain work in hardwoods like oak and maple? I ask because the nickers seem small, like on Stanleys other planes, i.e. #45 and 78 ect. thx!
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialGet instant access to over 100 digital plans available only to UNLIMITED members. Start your 14-day FREE trial - and get building!
Become an UNLIMITED member and get it all: searchable online archive of every issue, how-to videos, Complete Illustrated Guide to Woodworking digital series, print magazine, e-newsletter, and more.
Get complete site access to video workshops, digital plans library, online archive, and more, plus the print magazine.
Already a member? Log in
Replies
I have a 78 and hate it, now collecting dust.
Best bet is don’t rely on nickers, score a line.
I have a 78 and hate it, now collecting dust.
Best bet is don’t rely on nickers, score a line.
I Do them by router but use a router plane to even out bottoms.
I have a 278 and use it more like a shoulder plane. It is so small and hard to grip I've never considered it to run a crossgrain rabbet. With such a short body and so little mass the nickers just sorta stop progress.
I've only tried a few 278s, and hated them. Awkward. No good place to get a grip. Fiddly controls.
The Veritas skew rabbet is a fantastic tool. Head and shoulders above anything else, either with the grain or across it.
If you just want rabbets with the grain, wooden planes are fantastic.
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled