I am building a dining table. The top will be roughly 36″w x 72″l x 3/4+thk.
Does anyone prefer to curf the bottom side, well within the outside edge of course, in order to preserve flatness of the top?
I am building a dining table. The top will be roughly 36″w x 72″l x 3/4+thk.
Does anyone prefer to curf the bottom side, well within the outside edge of course, in order to preserve flatness of the top?
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialGet instant access to over 100 digital plans available only to UNLIMITED members. Start your 14-day FREE trial - and get building!
Become an UNLIMITED member and get it all: searchable online archive of every issue, how-to videos, Complete Illustrated Guide to Woodworking digital series, print magazine, e-newsletter, and more.
Get complete site access to video workshops, digital plans library, online archive, and more, plus the print magazine.
Already a member? Log in
Replies
1: no
2: doing so probably increases the stress you create on the table. Saw kerfs give more surface area to the underside of the table, letting it absorb / dissipate humidity at a different rate than the top, and therefore warp easier. Also, how sure are you of getting a good seal with the finish inside the kerfs?
Alternating faces is one method of trying to alleviate cupping in a top (smiley up, smiley down) and there have been numerous unsettled discussions as to whether or not that does any better than aligning them all the same way. If the joinery is good, if you sand it flat, finish it flat, and keep it unrestricted in movement via table top clips or other similar method, you shouldn't have any worries.
Not sure it would be necessary to kerf the underside, and as the previous reply stated, it probably add a lot of stress to the top.
I can tell you from personal experience that a way to guarantee the top will curl is to finish only the top...
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled